• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • WCW HOME
  • Submit a Wire!
  • Advertising
  • Media Partners
  • About
  • Contact Us

WorkCompWire

Your Trusted Source for Workers Compensation News

Enlyte
  • Workers Compensation News
    • Workers Compensation Industry News
    • Association, Rating & Research News
    • Claims, Legal, & Compliance News
    • Legislative & Regulatory News
    • Risk Management News
    • Work Force & Human Resource News
  • Featured Articles
  • Leaders Speak
  • Editor’s Forum
  • People On The Move

KS AG: KS Supreme Court Upholds State Prerogative to Adopt Newer WC Eval Guidelines

January 13, 2021 - WorkCompWire

Topeka, KS – Kansas Attorney General Derek Schmidt recently noted that the Kansas Supreme Court has upheld the constitutionality of an amendment to the Kansas Workers Compensation Act that adopted more recent guidelines for assessing medical impairment.

“Our position has been that the Legislature had authority to update the law as it did,” said Schmidt, whose office successfully defended the statute after intervening in the case to request the Kansas Supreme Court’s review. “Today the Supreme Court agreed. We have successfully defended this duly enacted state law.”

The Kansas Supreme Court unanimously reversed the Court of Appeals’ 2018 ruling that had found the updated law unconstitutional. In today’s opinion, the court ruled that the law does not violate Section 18 of the Kansas Bill of Rights because the use of medical evaluation guidelines only serves as a base for determining compensation, while the law still requires “competent medical evidence.”

In 2013, the Legislature amended the Kansas Workers Compensation Act to require use of the Sixth Edition of the American Medical Association (AMA) Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment to rate the impairment of injuries sustained after January 1, 2015. The Kansas Court of Appeals in 2018 had struck down that amendment as unconstitutional, instead requiring that the Fourth Edition of the AMA Guides, which was in place under the law prior to the 2013 change, be reinstated going forward.

The Kansas Supreme Court reversed the Court of Appeals and upheld the updated statute.

“The 2013 amendments merely reflect an update to the most recent set of guidelines—which serve as a starting point for any medical opinion,” Justice Caleb Stegall wrote for the court. “Aside from an updated starting point, the legal substance of K.S.A. 2019 Supp. 44- 510e(a)(2)(B) remains the same as it has been. Given this, the challenge under section 18 of the Kansas Constitution Bill of Rights necessarily fails.”

View a copy of the ruling: Johnson v. U.S. Food Service (PDF)

Source: KS AG’s Office

Filed Under: Claims, Legal, & Compliance News, Industry News, Top Stories, Workers' Compensation

Primary Sidebar

Get Our Free Newsletter:

Select list(s) to subscribe to


By submitting this form, you are consenting to receive marketing emails from: WorkCompWire.com, PO Box 1114, Culver City, CA, 90232, http://www.workcompwire.com. You can revoke your consent to receive emails at any time by using the SafeUnsubscribe® link, found at the bottom of every email. Emails are serviced by Constant Contact

myMatrixx

Paradigm

MSQ

Follow Us on Twitter

Tweets by WorkCompWire

Workers Compensation News Topics

  • Top Stories
  • Featured Articles
  • Leaders Speak
  • Editor’s Forum
  • The RxProfessor
  • Industry News
  • Association, Rating & Research News
  • People On The Move
  • Claims, Legal, & Compliance News
  • Legislative & Regulatory News
  • Risk Management News
  • Work Force & Human Resource News
  • Workers’ Compensation

Wire Archives

Copyright WorkCompWire © 2023